Ex parte STEWART - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 1998-0040                                                                                     Page 3                        
                 Application No. 08/068,753                                                                                                             


                 Oba et al. (Oba)             2                        59133335                            Jan. 22, 1986                                
                 (published Japanese Kokai Patent Application)                                                                                          





                          Claims 20-25 and 27 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                                                                      
                 as being unpatentable over Riley in view of Rubin, Gallego and                                                                         
                 Takahashi.  Claim 26 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                                                                          
                 being unpatentable over Riley in view of Rubin, Gallego and                                                                            
                 Takahashi and further in view of Sakamoto, Toshiba and                                                                                 
                 Wanlass.                                                                                                                               


                                                                     OPINION                                                                            
                          Upon careful consideration of appellant’s specification                                                                       
                 and the claims on appeal, the evidence of obviousness relied                                                                           
                 upon by the examiner, and the opposing arguments presented by                                                                          
                 appellant and the examiner, we find that the aforementioned §                                                                          
                 103 rejections are not well founded.  Accordingly, we will not                                                                         
                 sustain the examiner’s rejections.                                                                                                     


                          2All references to Oba in this decision are to the                                                                            
                 English language translation thereof of record, a copy of                                                                              
                 which is enclosed with the decision.                                                                                                   







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007