Ex parte PLEASANT - Page 1




             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        
                                                                 Paper No. 38         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                              Ex parte RONALD E. PLEASANT                             
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1998-0256                                 
                              Application No. 08/395,768                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and STAAB, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 28                
          through 39.  Claims 10 through 27 stand allowed.  These claims              
          constitute all of the claims remaining in the application.                  


               Appellant’s invention pertains to an improvement in a                  
          mold insert.  A basic understanding of the invention can be                 
          derived from a reading of exemplary claim 28, a copy of which               
          appears in the APPENDIX to the brief filed December 30, 1996                
          (Paper No. 34).                                                             






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007