Appeal No. 1998-0256 Application No. 08/395,768 assembly is achieved by an undercut in each of the confronting sidewalls of the groove intended for gouging engagement by locking screws or pins to insure that the dam during use will not slide or otherwise move around or become loose to avoid the danger that a loose dam would fly away from a rotating insert and cause injury to a lathe operator. Thus, appellant teaches the solution to the problem of a dam flying off a rotating insert and causing injury is to provide an undercut in each of the walls of the groove for engagement by locking members (screws or pins). Simply stated, appellant’s specification offers no suggestion whatsoever that an undercut provided in one sidewall of the groove, when engaged by a screw or pin, would so secure a dam that the problem of the dam flying off a rotating insert and causing injury would be solved thereby. Clearly, appellant’s disclosure can fairly be viewed as a restricted or narrow disclosure. It offers a preferred embodiment (Fig. 7) to solve the noted dam securement problem that requires an undercut in each of the two sidewalls of the 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007