Appeal No. 1998-0256 Application No. 08/395,768 At this point, we turn our attention to the content of claim 28. This independent claim requires a mold insert comprising a solid metal body having a circumferentially- extending, outwardly-open, liquid conduit groove formed therein with an improvement wherein the groove has mutually confronting side walls, "one of which is provided with an undercut having an imperforate, sloping surface facing inwardly of the insert" for clamping engagement by "a locking element" for mounting a liquid barrier dam assembly in the groove. Like the examiner, we conclude that appellant’s originally filed underlying disclosure, read as a whole, fails to reasonably convey to one skilled in the art that appellant had possession of the later claimed subject matter of claim 28. It is quite clear to us that the import of appellant’s teaching, personified by the preferred and modified embodiments of Figs. 7 and 8, respectively, is that the objective of securely installing a liquid dam or barrier 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007