Appeal No. 1998-0706
Application 08/166,279
routing tables. Because appellants have not shown any error
in the examiner's reasoning, the rejection of claim 20 is
affirmed.
As the foregoing unconvincing argument is appellants'
sole argument with respect to claim 26 and dependent claim 27,
the rejection of those claims is also affirmed.
G. Summary
In summary, the rejection of claims 8, 12, 16, and 30-39
is reversed and the rejection of claims 17, 20, 26, and 27 is
affirmed.
- 14 -
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007