The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 38
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WALTER LANGE, MICHAEL GROSSE-BLEY, BRUNO BOMER, ROLF
GROSSER, and FRANZ P. HOEVER
____________
Appeal No. 1998-0900
Application No. 08/290,047
____________
HEARD: April 5, 2001
____________
Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, ROBINSON, and MILLS, Administrative Patent Judges.
ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 - 4, 15, and 16. Claims 5 - 7 and 11 - 14 stand withdrawn from
consideration by the examiner and are not presented on appeal.
Claim 1 is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and reads as follows:
1. Polymerisable enantiomers of optically active dipeptides substantially free
of other enantiomers, of the general formula (I)
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007