Ex Parte KITAKAMI et al - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1998-1658                                                        
          Application 08/343,876                                                      

               leading gap edge in a running direction of said ring head,             
               thereby to carry out recording and/or reproducing;                     
                    wherein said leading gap edge of high saturation                  
               magnetic flux density material has a saturation magnetic               
               flux density of at least 1.2 times that of a low saturation            
               magnetic flux density material of said trailing gap edge;              
               and                                                                    
                    wherein a substantial direction of a principle [sic]              
               axis of said magnetic anisotropy rises by 10-80° from said             
               recording surface of said recording medium.                            

               The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                        
               Shimizu et al. (Shimizu '178)  4,587,178         May 6, 1986           
               Okuda et al. (Okuda)           4,953,049     August 28, 1990           
               Yokoyama et al. (Yokoyama)     5,140,486     August 18, 1992           
          (filed November 14, 1990)                                                   
               Shimizu et al. (Shimizu '645)  5,155,645    October 13, 1992           
          (filed November 13, 1990)                                                   
               Kobayashi et al. (Kobayashi)   5,212,612        May 18, 1993           
          (filed February 6, 1991)                                                    
               Claims 1, 4-6, 8, and 11-13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.             
          § 103(a) as unpatentable over Shimizu '178 and Kobayashi.                   
               Claims 7 and 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as             
          unpatentable over Shimizu '178 and Kobayashi as applied in the              
          rejection of claim 1, further in view of Yokoyama.                          
               Claims 1, 4-6, 8, and 11-13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.             
          § 103(a) as unpatentable over Shimizu '178 and Shimizu '645.                
               Claims 7 and 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as             
          unpatentable over Shimizu '178 and Shimizu '645 as applied in the           
          rejection of claim 1, further in view of Yokoyama.                          



                                        - 3 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007