Ex parte ISHIBASHI - Page 11




                 Appeal No. 1998-1669                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/508,563                                                                                                             


                 out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the                                                                                  
                 appellant regards as his invention.                                                                                                    
                          The second paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 (1999) states:                                                                        
                                   The specification shall conclude with one or                                                                         
                                   more claims particularly pointing out and                                                                            
                                   distinctly claiming the subject matter which the                                                                     
                                   applicant regards as his invention.                                                                                  
                 The “distinctly claiming” requirement means that the claims                                                                            
                 must have a clear and definite meaning when construed in light                                                                         
                 of the complete patent specification.  Standard Oil Co. v.                                                                             
                 American Cyanamid Co., 774 F.2d 448, 452, 227 USPQ 293, 296                                                                            
                 (Fed. Cir. 1985).  Thus, section 112 ensures definiteness of                                                                           
                 claim language.  In re Zletz, 893 F.2d 893 F.2d 319, 322, 13                                                                           
                 USPQ2d 1320, 1322 (Fed. Cir. 1989).                                                                                                    
                          In this regard, the purpose of a patent claim is to                                                                           
                 define the scope of protection  and hence what the claim5                                                                                
                 precludes others from doing.  Because a patent confers upon                                                                            
                 the patentee the right to exclude others from making, using                                                                            
                 and selling the claimed invention, the public must be apprised                                                                         
                 of what the patent covers, so that those who approach the area                                                                         


                          5    In re Vamco Machine & Tool, Inc., 752 F.2d 1564, 224                                                                     
                 USPQ 617 (Fed. Cir. 1985).                                                                                                             
                                                                          11                                                                            





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007