Ex parte AKUTSU et al. - Page 1




                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                          
                    today was not written for publication and is not                                              
                    binding precedent of the Board.                                                               
                                                                                Paper No. 23                      

                             UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                              ________________                                                    
                                  BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                              ________________                                                    
                  Ex parte EIICHI AKUTSU, HIROSHI TAKAYAMA, SHIGEHITO ANDO,                                       
                                     KENJI OGI and YASUHIRO UEHARA                                                
                                              ________________                                                    
                                           Appeal No. 1998-2215                                                   
                                          Application 08/700,578                                                  
                                              ________________                                                    
                                                   ON BRIEF                                                       
                                              ________________                                                    
             Before GARRIS, WARREN and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                       
             OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                  

                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                    This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of                                      
             claims 1-8, 10-15 and 19-24, which are all of the claims                                             
             remaining in the application.                                                                        
                                                THE INVENTION                                                     
                    The appellants’ claimed invention is directed toward a                                        
             device for heating and fixing a toner image in an image                                              

                                                      -1-1                                                        





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007