The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte MIKIO KITA and KAORU URATA ____________ Appeal No. 1998-2591 Application No. 08/636,304 ____________ HEARD: JANUARY 16, 2001 ____________ Before BARRETT, RUGGIERO, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the rejection of claims 1-21. We reverse. BACKGROUND The invention at issue in this appeal relates to helical scanning magnetic recording/playback devices. A conventional U-tape loading mechanism features a magnetic tape wound on a supply reel and a take-up reel in a tape cassette. When thePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007