Appeal No. 1998-3320 Application 08/417,017 conductive particles. The appellant argues that Tsunaga provides no teaching which would have suggested to one of ordinary skill in the art that coating the copper particles with silver and the titanate coupling agent would reduce the conductance of the pigment to 80% or less of the original conductance (brief, page 4). Tsunaga’s silver coated copper particles fall within the scope of the appellants’ term “conductive pigment”. A comparison of Tsunaga’s comparative example 3 and examples 3 and 4, as discussed above, shows that use of a titanate reduced the conductance to 80% or less of the conductance of silver coated copper particles having no titanate. The appellants argue that Tsunaga’s powder is intended to be of high electrical conductance (brief, page 5). Tsunaga states that the particles are to have good or high conductivity (col. 1, line 53; col. 2, lines 55-56). However, Tsunaga’s examples 3 and 4 indicate that the terms “high conductivity” and “good conductivity” include conductivities which are reduced 20% or more compared to the conductivities of particles having no titanate (comparative example 3). For the above reasons we conclude that the pigment 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007