The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte YUKIO FUZISAWA, TAKEHIRO FURUKAWA, and TAKASHI YAMASAKI ____________ Appeal No. 1998-3326 Application No. 08/498,819 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before BARRETT, RUGGIERO, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the rejection of claims 1 and 3-10. We reverse. BACKGROUND The appellants’ invention relates to “arbitration” and “arbitration judgement.” Arbitration is the process of acquiring the right to transmit data via a data bus;Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007