Ex parte FUZISAWA et al. - Page 5




          Appeal No. 1998-3326                                       Page 5           
          Application No. 08/498,819                                                  


               In rejecting claims under 35 U.S.C. Section 103, the                   
               examiner bears the initial burden of presenting a                      
               prima facie case of obviousness.  In re Oetiker, 977                   
               F.2d 1443, 1445, 24 USPQ2d 1443, 1444 (Fed. Cir.                       
               1992)....  "A prima facie case of obviousness is                       
               established when the teachings from the prior art                      
               itself would appear to have suggested the claimed                      
               subject matter to a person of ordinary skill in the                    
               art."  In re Bell, 991 F.2d 781, 782, 26 USPQ2d                        
               1529, 1531 (Fed. Cir. 1993) (quoting In re Rinehart,                   
               531 F.2d 1048, 1051, 189 USPQ 143, 147 (CCPA 1976)).                   

          With these principles in mind, we consider the examiner's                   
          rejection and the appellants' argument.                                     


               The examiner asserts, "Miyazaki discloses an invention                 
          substantially as claimed, including a data processing ('DP')                
          system comprising ... initializing means [column 4 (line 67) -              
          column 5 (line 12)]".  (Examiner's Answer at 3.)  The                       
          appellants argue, “neither Miyazaki nor Okada et al. disclose               
          or suggest the fundamental concept of initialization means                  
          resetting the counter in response to a signal from an external              
          circuit."  (Appeal Br. at 11.)                                              


               “‘[T]he main purpose of the examination, to which every                
          application is subjected, is to try to make sure that what                  








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007