The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 14 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte STEPHEN F. BAUMANN, ROBERT E. SANDERS, JR., and SCOTT L. PALMER __________ Appeal No. 1999-0130 Application No. 08/439,035 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before WARREN, TIMM, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges. DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1, 3 through 7, 10, 12 through 14, 16, 17, 19, and 21 through 23, which are all of the claims pending in the above-identified application.1 1 In reply to the final Office action of September 2, 1997 (paper 8), the appellants submitted an amendment under 37 CFR § 1.116 (1997) on March 6, 1998 (paper 9), proposing the cancellation of claims 9, 11, 18, and 20 and changes to claims 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007