Appeal No. 1999-0153
Application No. 08/488,394
signal to said portion of said circuit using said synchronous
clock signal, and
a second multiplexer for selectively providing said
output from said first multiplexer or said asynchronous clock
signal to said portion of said circuit using said asynchronous
clock signal.
The Examiner relies on the following prior art:
Staiger 4,203,543 May 20, 1980
Claim 1 stands finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Staiger.
Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants and the
Examiner, reference is made to the Brief and Answer for the
respective details.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on
appeal, the rejection advanced by the Examiner, the arguments
in support of the rejection and the evidence of obviousness
relied upon by the Examiner as support for the rejection. We
have, likewise, reviewed and taken into consideration, in
reaching our decision, Appellants’ arguments set forth in the
Brief along with the Examiner’s rationale in support of the
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007