Appeal No. 1999-0498 Application 08/532,225 as the result of another instruction [brief, pages 13-14]. We again agree with the position argued by appellants. Representative claim 29 recites the same feature discussed above. Specifically, claim 29 recites that a first bit indicates the availability of a source operand before said operand is actually computed as a result of the execution of another instruction. For reasons discussed above, none of the applied prior art references teach or suggest this aspect of the claimed invention. Therefore, we do not sustain the examiner’s rejection of claims 29-36 for reasons already discussed. 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007