Ex parte FETTERMAN et al. - Page 9




          Appeal No. 1999-0498                                                        
          Application 08/532,225                                                      


          as the result of another instruction [brief, pages 13-14].                  
          We again agree with the position argued by appellants.                      
          Representative claim 29 recites the same feature discussed                  
          above.  Specifically, claim 29 recites that a first bit                     
          indicates the availability of a source operand before said                  
          operand is actually computed as a result of the execution of                
          another instruction.  For reasons discussed above, none of the              
          applied prior art references teach or suggest this aspect of                
          the claimed invention.  Therefore, we do not sustain the                    
          examiner’s rejection of claims 29-36 for reasons already                    
          discussed.                                                                  


















                                          9                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007