Ex parte BALLESTEROS - Page 14




                     Appeal No. 1999-0674                                                                                                          
                     Application No. 08/654,536                                                                                                    

                              The formation of the channel in Hayachi’s bread product is reinforced by our prior                                   
                     analysis of the Rheon dispenser and our discussion of appellant’s concessions regarding the                                   
                     Rheon dispenser.  As noted in our review of the examiner’s rejection, the recitation in claims 17                             
                     and 23 that the border area of the channel is “in a pushed aside condition caused by                                          
                     displacement of the softer interior into said border area during formation of the channel” is a                               
                     method limitation.  It therefore is not entitled to weight in determining the patentability of the                            
                     product claims on appeal in this case.  See In re Thorpe, 777 F.2d at 697, 227 USPQ at 966.                                   
                     In any case, even if it were required to give this limitation weight in determining the patentability                         
                     of claims 17 and 23, the insertion of Hayachi’s spout into the bread product will inherently push                             
                     aside some  interior dough to meet the limitation that the border area of the channel is in a                                 
                     “pushed aside condition.”  Furthermore, since the prior art Edhard dispenser and filling spout                                
                     equipment selected by appellant were commercially available at the time of appellant’s                                        
                     invention, it follows that the advantages of that equipment were also known in the art to provide                             
                     the appropriate motivation to utilize that equipment in the Hayachi apparatus to prepare the                                  
                     bread product in the Hayachi patent.  With regard to claim 23, one of ordinary skill in the art                               
                     would have recognized that a curved channel is advantageously formed in a toroidal bread                                      
                     product in light of Edhard’s teaching of filling a donut and utilizing a curved filling spout as                              
                     discussed supra.                                                                                                              
                              With further regard to claim 23, bread products having a toroidal shape are well known                               
                     in the art.  Furthermore, the Edhard metering system pamphlet recognizes a toroidal bakery                                    
                     product shape as an alternative to an elongated shape.  This evidence taken collectively would                                
                                                                                                                                                                                       
                     statements.  Accordingly copies of these references are not included with this decision.                                      
                                                                        14                                                                         





Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007