Appeal No. 1999-0674
Application No. 08/654,536
until conclusion of the prosecution before the examiner unless, as a mere incident to the limited
prosecution, the affirmed rejection is overcome.
If the appellant elects prosecution before the examiner and this does not result in
allowance of the application, abandonment or a second appeal, this case should be returned to
the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences for final action on the affirmed rejection,
including any timely request for rehearing thereof.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be
extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
37 CFR § 1.196(b)
Harrison E. McCandlish, Senior )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
Jeffrey V. Nase )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
Jennifer D. Bahr )
Administrative Patent Judge )
18
Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007