Ex parte KIM - Page 2




              Appeal No. 1999-1116                                                                                        
              Application No. 08/635,170                                                                                  

                                                    BACKGROUND                                                            
                     The invention is directed to a process for preventing sequencer overrun, which is an                 
              error condition in a disk controller.  Claim 1 is reproduced below.                                         
                     1.     A sequencer overrun prevention method, comprising the steps of:                               
                            initializing a sequencer;                                                                     
                            reading a timer value indicating when said sequencer begins operation;                        
                            calculating a sequencer halting point by adding a predetermined time                          
                     constant to said timer value;                                                                        
                            determining whether said sequencer operates at said sequencer halting                         
                     point; and                                                                                           
                            forcibly halting said sequencer when said sequencer operates at said                          
                     sequencer halting point.                                                                             
                     The examiner relies on the following reference:                                                      
              Machado et al. (Machado)                   5,517,631                    May 14, 1996                        
                                                                              (filed Jul.  7, 1993)                       
                     Claims 1-14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by                             
              Machado.                                                                                                    
                     We refer to the Final Rejection (mailed Dec. 12, 1997) and the Examiner's Answer                     
              (mailed Sep. 1, 1998) for a statement of the examiner's position and to the Brief (filed June               
              15, 1998) and the Reply Brief (filed Oct. 29, 1998) for appellant's position with respect to                
              the claims which stand rejected.                                                                            



                                                           -2-                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007