Ex parte METLITSKY et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1999-1345                                       Page 3           
          Application No. 08/482,556                                                  


          tuned, via feedback, to the lowest bandwidth sufficient to                  
          pass the frequency of the detected signal.                                  




               Claim 33, which is representative for our purposes,                    
          follows:                                                                    
                    33. A system for detecting reflected light,                       
               comprising:                                                            
                    a light source for generating a light beam;                       
                    means for sweeping the light beam across an                       
               object;                                                                
                    means for detecting light reflected by the                        
               object and for generating electrical signals                           
               indicative of the detected light; and                                  
                    circuitry means for discriminating the                            
               electrical signals, said circuitry means including                     
                         means for filtering with a respective                        
               cutoff frequency each electrical signal to provide a                   
               respective output signal having a respective                           
               bandwidth, wherein the circuitry means includes                        
                    a differentiator circuit, coupled to the                          
               detecting means, for generating a first derivative                     
               signal of each electrical signal.                                      


               The prior art applied in rejecting the claims follows:                 









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007