Appeal No. 1999-1345 Page 13 Application No. 08/482,556 capacitor in series with a switch.” Therefore, we affirm the rejection of claims 34 and 41 as being anticipated by Hebert. Our affirmances are based only on the arguments made in the briefs. Arguments not made therein are neither before us nor at issue but are considered waived. CONCLUSION In summary, the rejection of claims 33-36 and 40-43 under the judicially created doctrine of double patenting is reversed. The rejection of claims 33, 34, 40, and 41 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b), however, is affirmed.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007