Ex parte CHITTIPEDDI - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 1999-1576                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/347,527                                                                                                             









                          The references relied on by the examiner are:                                                                                 
                 Jastrzebski                         4,619,033                                             Oct.  28, 1986                               
                 Eklund                              5,049,513                                             Sept. 17, 1991                               
                 Yoneda     1                        62-132342                                             June  15, 1987                               
                 (Japanese patent publication)                                                                                                          
                          Claims 15 and 18 through 36 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                                                                    
                 § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Yoneda in view of Eklund and                                                                       
                 Jastrzebski.                                                                                                                           
                          Reference is made to the brief (paper number 20) and the                                                                      
                 answer (paper number 21) for the respective positions of the                                                                           
                 appellant and the examiner.                                                                                                            
                                                                       OPINION                                                                          
                          For all of the reasons expressed by the appellant, and for                                                                    
                 the additional reasons set forth infra, we will reverse the 35                                                                         
                 U.S.C.                                                                                                                                 
                 § 103(a) rejection of claims 15 and 18 through 36.                                                                                     


                          1The examiner refers to this reference by the assignee,                                                                       
                 Matsushita (answer, page 3).                                                                                                           
                                                                           3                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007