Ex parte TANABE et al. - Page 5


         Appeal No. 1999-1835                                                       
         Application No. 08/654,976                                                 


         Nakamura                     2-310108            Dec. 25, 1990            
              (JP '108)(published                                                   
              JP patent document)                                                   
         Hamazaki                     3-169723            Jul. 23, 1991            
              (JP '723)(published                                                   
              JP patent document)                                                   
         Ito                         5-169917            Jul. 9, 1993             
              (JP '917)(published                                                   
              JP patent document)                                                   
              The claims on appeal stand rejected as follows:2                      
              I. claim 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by                 
         Yamaguchi (examiner's answer, pages 4-6);                                  
              II. claim 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over             
         the combined teachings of Yamaguchi and JP '723 (id. at pages 7-           
         8);                                                                        
              III. claims 5 through 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                   
         unpatentable over the combined teachings of Yamaguchi and Benson           
         (id. at pages 8-11);                                                       
              IV. claim 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over            
         the combined teachings of Yamaguchi, Benson, and JP '723 (id, at           
         pages 11-12);                                                              
              V. claims 13 and 15 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                       
         unpatentable over the combined teachings of JP '108, JP '712,              
         and Yamaguchi (id. at pages 12-14); and                                    
                                                                                   
              2  The rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, of          
         claims 8, 10, and 13 through 18 as set out in the final Office             


                                         5                                          



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007