Appeal No. 1999-1835 Application No. 08/654,976 Nakamura 2-310108 Dec. 25, 1990 (JP '108)(published JP patent document) Hamazaki 3-169723 Jul. 23, 1991 (JP '723)(published JP patent document) Ito 5-169917 Jul. 9, 1993 (JP '917)(published JP patent document) The claims on appeal stand rejected as follows:2 I. claim 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Yamaguchi (examiner's answer, pages 4-6); II. claim 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the combined teachings of Yamaguchi and JP '723 (id. at pages 7- 8); III. claims 5 through 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the combined teachings of Yamaguchi and Benson (id. at pages 8-11); IV. claim 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the combined teachings of Yamaguchi, Benson, and JP '723 (id, at pages 11-12); V. claims 13 and 15 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the combined teachings of JP '108, JP '712, and Yamaguchi (id. at pages 12-14); and 2 The rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, of claims 8, 10, and 13 through 18 as set out in the final Office 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007