Appeal No. 1999-1835 Application No. 08/654,976 Moreover, the motivation provided in the prior art does not have to be the same as that of the appellants. In re Kemps, 97 F.3d 1427, 1430, 40 USPQ2d 1309, 1311 (Fed. Cir. 1996). VI. Rejection of Claims 13, 15, 16, and 18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over the Combined Teachings of JP '917, JP '712, and Yamaguchi The examiner found: Japan '917, directed to a pneumatic tire which one of ordinary skill in the art would readily understand as being vulcanized as all pneumatic tires are, discloses a pneumatic tire having blocks which are defined by circumferential grooves and lateral grooves wherein each block contains plural sipes. In figure 1, Japan '917 shows each sipe as having a bent portion. In figures 2-6, Japan '917 shows two different embodiments. In each of these embodiments, each sipe has an enlarged portion at the bottom thereof. The shape of the enlarged portion ("flask shaped portion") can be best seen in figures 7 and 8. The enlarged portion is "divided" at the bent portion. For example, see figure 2 and figure 3 and figure 4. (Examiner's answer, page 14.) The examiner further found that JP '712 teaches "a sipe in a block of a pneumatic tire wherein (1) the sipe comprises a 'flask shaped' enlarged bottom portion and (2) the sipe has an end terminating in the block instead of being open at both ends." (Id.) Additionally, the examiner determined: "Yamaguchi teaches providing sipes in the block of the tread and specifically suggests sipes each of whose one end 18Page: Previous 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007