Appeal No. 1999-1855
Application 08/738,916
Examiner does not even attempt to address these limitations in
the final rejection or the examiner's answer. Accordingly,
the anticipation rejection of claims 21 and 23 is reversed.
CONCLUSION
The rejection of claims 8-10 and 23 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 112, first paragraph, lack of enablement is reversed.
The rejection of claims 8-10 under § 102 is sustained.
The rejection of claims 21 and 23 under § 102 is
reversed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
- 13 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007