Appeal No. 1999-1889 Page 3 Application No. 08/366,988 Claim 1, which is representative for present purposes, follows: 1. An ink cartridge, comprising first and second vacuum producing materials respectively having first and second vacuum producing capacities respectively for dispensing and storing ink, the first and second materials being in surface-to-surface contact with each other enclosed inside a cartridge body, the cartridge body having a communication opening through one side of the cartridge body that is in communication with the first material for discharging the ink from the first material and the cartridge body and a venting hole in the one side of the cartridge body for balancing pressure inside and outside of the cartridge body. The prior art applied by the examiner in rejecting the claims follows: Koitabashi et al. (“Koitabashi”), European Patent Application 0581531, Feb. 1994 Barta, Translation of French Patent 2,229,320 (Dec. 1974). Claims 1, 3, 5, 6, 10, 13, and 16-22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Koitabashi. Claims 12, 14, 15, and 23-26 stand rejected under § 103(a) as obvious over Koitabashi in view of Barta. Rather than reiterate the arguments of the appellants or examiner in toto, we refer thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007