Ex parte WONG et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1999-1889                                       Page 3           
          Application No. 08/366,988                                                  


               Claim 1, which is representative for present purposes,                 
          follows:                                                                    
               1.   An ink cartridge, comprising first and second                     
               vacuum producing materials respectively having first                   
               and second vacuum producing capacities respectively                    
               for dispensing and storing ink, the first and second                   
               materials being in surface-to-surface contact with                     
               each other enclosed inside a cartridge body, the                       
               cartridge body having a communication opening                          
               through one side of the cartridge body that is in                      
               communication with the first material for                              
               discharging the ink from the first material and the                    
               cartridge body and a venting hole in the one side of                   
               the cartridge body for balancing pressure inside and                   
               outside of the cartridge body.                                         


               The prior art applied by the examiner in rejecting the                 
          claims follows:                                                             
               Koitabashi et al. (“Koitabashi”), European Patent                      
               Application 0581531, Feb. 1994                                         
               Barta, Translation of French Patent 2,229,320 (Dec.                    
               1974).                                                                 
          Claims 1, 3, 5, 6, 10, 13, and 16-22 stand rejected under                   
          35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Koitabashi.  Claims 12, 14,              
          15, and 23-26 stand rejected under § 103(a) as obvious over                 
          Koitabashi in view of Barta.  Rather than reiterate the                     
          arguments of the appellants or examiner in toto, we refer the               









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007