Interference 103,579
interference and designate Claims 25-49 of Hofvander’s
involved application as corresponding to the count without
due explanation or reasons therefore was dismissed (37 CFR
§ 1.637(a))(Paper No. 74, p. 11).
(7) Hofvander’s Preliminary Motion 4 (HPM 4)
(Paper No. 31) to have Visser’s Claim 22 designated as
corresponding to Hofvander Proposed Count H-1, now Count 2,
to correct an apparent inadvertent error, was granted
(Paper No. 74, p. 12).
(8) Hofvander’s Preliminary Motion 5 (HPM 5)(Paper
No. 35) to amend Claims 1, 4, 7, and 10 of Hofvander’s
involved application, filed November 24, 1993, by deleting
the phrase “fragments encoding the amino acid sequences of
SEQ ID Nos. 6-17" and redefine the interfering subject
matter by designating the claims, as amended, as
corresponding to the count, was granted (Paper No. 74,
p. 12).
(9) Visser’s Preliminary Motion 5 (VPM 5)(Paper
No. 21) to have Visser’s Claims 1, 4, 8, 11, 13-20, 22,
and 24-27 designated not to correspond to the count was
denied “for the reasons stated by Hofvander’s opposition
(Paper No. 50)” (Paper No. 74, pp. 12-13).
(10) Visser’s Preliminary Notions 6 (VPM 6)(Paper
-14-
Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007