Interference 103,579
none of Claims 1, 4, 6-23 and 50 of Hofvander’s involved
application are drawn to the “same patentable invention” as
Claims 1, 4-8, 11, 13-20, and 22-27 of Visser’s involved
application;
FURTHER ORDERED that, on the record before the Board of
Patent Appeals and Interferences, party PER HOFVANDER; PER T.
PERSSON; ANNELI TALLBERG, deceased, by LENNART HANSSON, Legal
Representative; and OLLE WIKSTROM, is not entitled to a patent
containing Claim 6 of Hofvander’s U.S. Application 08/070,455,
filed November 24, 1993;
FURTHER ORDERED that, on the record before the Board of
Patent Appeals and Interferences, party RICHARD G.F. VISSER,
EVERT JACOBSEN, and WILLEM J. FEENSTRA, is not entitled to a
patent containing Claim 23 of Visser’s U.S. Application
08/294,619, filed August 23, 1994;
FURTHER ORDERED that, on the record before the Board of
Patent Appeals and Interferences, Visser has not shown that party
PER HOFVANDER; PER T. PERSSON; ANNELI TALLBERG, deceased, by
LENNART HANSSON, Legal Representative; and OLLE WIKSTROM, is not
entitled to a patent containing Claims 1, 4, 7-23 and 50 of
Hofvander’s U.S. Application 08/070,455, filed November 24, 1993;
FURTHER ORDERED that, on the record before the Board of
Patent Appeals and Interferences, Hofvander has not shown party
RICHARD G.F. VISSER, EVERT JACOBSEN, and WILLEM J. FEENSTRA, is
-130-
Page: Previous 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007