Ex Parte KATSURA et al - Page 1



          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                            Paper No. 81              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                       Ex parte KOYO KATSURA, SHIGERU MATSUO,                         
                SHIGEAKI YOSHIDA, HIROSHI TAKEDA AND HISASHI KAZIWARA                 
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2000-0064                                  
                               Application 08/625,241                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                HEARD: MARCH 19, 2002                                 
                                     ___________                                      
          Before JERRY SMITH, FLEMING and GROSS, Administrative Patent                
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
          This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                      
          from the examiner’s rejection of claims 19-22 and 31-33, which              
          constitute all the claims remaining in the application.  An                 
          amendment after final rejection was filed on August 14, 1997,               
          but was denied entry by the examiner.                                       
          The disclosed invention pertains to a graphic display                       
          system and to a method for controlling a graphic display system.            

                                          1                                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007