The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 44
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ALAN G. WOOD,
EUGENE H. CLOUD,
and
LARRY D. KINSMAN
__________
Appeal No. 2000-0622
Application No. 08/650,894
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT, and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims
82 through 91, 94 through 96 and 100 through 103. After the
submission of the brief, the examiner allowed claims 94 through
96 and 100 through 103 (answer, page 6). Accordingly, claims
82 through 91 remain before us on appeal.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007