The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte BEN BRUNER, JAMES F. HESLEP,
HANS-JOSEF BEHRENS, KONRAD SCHMITZ,
and
KARLHEINZ WOLF
__________
Appeal No. 2000-0698
Application No. 08/960,694
___________
HEARD: Nov. 7, 2002
___________
Before OWENS, LIEBERMAN, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent
Judges.
DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
(2002) from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 9 and 10,
which are all of the claims pending in the above-identified
application.
The subject matter on appeal relates to an elastane
multifilament yarn with two to six individual filaments which,
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007