Appeal No. 2000 0921 Application No. 08/366,090 in Roessler that would have suggested the claimed subject matter. Further, the examiner does not contend, and it is not apparent to us, that Flug makes up for the deficiencies of Roessler in this respect. In view of the foregoing, the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-54 as being unpatentable over Roessler in view of Flug cannot be sustained. The decision of the examiner is therefore reversed. REVERSED IRWIN CHARLES COHEN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT LAWRENCE J. STAAB ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JOHN P. McQUADE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) LJS/lp 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007