The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte MOHAMED E. LABIB
_______________
Appeal No. 2000-1006
Application No. 08/974,148
_______________
HEARD: March 20, 2002
_______________
Before GARRIS, KRATZ, and POTEATE, Administrative Patent Judges.
POTEATE, Administrative Patent Judge.
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-8 and 10-12, which are
all of the claims remaining in the application. Claim 9 was
cancelled in an amendment received October 12, 1998, Paper
No. 16.
Claims 1, 4, 6 and 10 are representative of the subject
matter on appeal and are reproduced below:
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007