The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 39 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte AKIO TANAKA, NAOTO MIWA, TOSHITAKA SAITO, HIROMI SANO, KAZUNORI SUZUKI and MASAYA FUJIMOTO __________ Appeal No. 2000-1075 Application 08/838,910 ___________ HEARD: MARCH 5, 2002 ___________ Before OWENS, LIEBERMAN and JEFFREY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 32-37 and refusal to allow claims 21-26 as amended after final rejection. Claims 12-15 and 27-31, which are all of the other claims pending in the application, have been indicated allowable. THE INVENTION The appellants’ claimed invention is directed toward an oxygen detector having a built-in heater. Claims 21 and 32 are 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007