Ex Parte TANAKA et al - Page 1



          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                            Paper No. 39              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                 Ex parte AKIO TANAKA, NAOTO MIWA, TOSHITAKA SAITO,                   
                  HIROMI SANO, KAZUNORI SUZUKI and MASAYA FUJIMOTO                    
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2000-1075                                  
                               Application 08/838,910                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                HEARD: MARCH 5, 2002                                  
                                     ___________                                      
          Before OWENS, LIEBERMAN and JEFFREY SMITH, Administrative Patent            
          Judges.                                                                     
          OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 32-37 and            
          refusal to allow claims 21-26 as amended after final rejection.             
          Claims 12-15 and 27-31, which are all of the other claims pending           
          in the application, have been indicated allowable.                          
                                    THE INVENTION                                     
               The appellants’ claimed invention is directed toward an                
          oxygen detector having a built-in heater.  Claims 21 and 32 are             
                                          1                                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007