The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte MARK H. ETZEL, DAVID W. FAUCHER,
DANIEL N. HEER, DAVID P. MAHER and
ROBERT J. RANCE
__________
Appeal No. 2000-1308
Application 08/550,909
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before THOMAS, KRASS and JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner’s rejection of claims 18-29, which constitute
all the claims remaining in the application. An amendment after
final rejection was filed on January 3, 2000 but was denied entry
by the examiner.
The disclosed invention pertains to the field of
transmitting protected material over communication channels.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007