Ex Parte IMAINO et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2000-1414                                                                                      
              Application No. 08/840,351                                                                                


                                                   BACKGROUND                                                           
                     Appellants' invention relates to a system and method for detecting defects in a                    
              planar surface.  An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of                       
              exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced below.                                                             
                     1.     An apparatus for detecting defects in planar surfaces of a [sic, an]                        
                     object comprising:                                                                                 
                            means for directing a first laser beam (the A-beam) along a first                           
                     path;                                                                                              
                            a first telecentric lens assembly including one or more lenses;                             
                            first rotating mirror means for scanning the A-beam through the first                       
                     telecentric lens assembly and across at least a portion of a first planar                          
                     surface, the A-beam striking the first planar surface of the object at [sic, at                    
                     an] angle which deviates from perpendicular in one plane by an angle                               
                     which causes a portion of the A-beam to form a reflected beam                                      
                     (A/R-beam) passing back through the telecentric lens assembly and being                            
                     reflected off of the rotating mirror means along a second path; and                                
                            a first light detector arranged in the second path producing an                             
                     A-analog signal proportional to the intensity of the A/R-beam.                                     
                     The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                    
              appealed claims are:                                                                                      
              Cuthbert et al. (Cuthbert)                3,790,287                   Feb.  05, 1974                      
              Kato et al. (Kato)                        4,464,050                   Aug.  07, 1984                      
              Hellstrom                                 5,073,712            Dec.  17, 1991                             
              Taylor                                    5,581,353                   Dec.  03, 1996                      

                     Claims 1, 3 and 4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                       
              over Cuthbert in view of Kato.  Claims 2, 9-13, and 16-25 stand rejected under                            
                                                           2                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007