Ex Parte BULUCEA et al - Page 1




              The opinion in support of the decision being entered                 
              today was not written for publication in a law journal               
              and is not binding precedent of the Board.                           
                                                             Paper No. 38          


                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                     
                                                                                  
                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                         
                                AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                                                                  
                            Ex parte CONSTANTIN BULUCEA                            
                                        and                                        
                                  REBECCA ROSSEN                                   
                                                                                  
                               Appeal No. 2000-1483                                
                            Application No. 08/851,608                             
                                                                                  
                                     ON BRIEF                                      
                                                                                  
         Before HAIRSTON, KRASS and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent                
         Judges.                                                                   
         KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       


                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                 
              This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of             
         claims 17-21, 25-37, 39-41, 44, 46-58, 60-62, 64 and 65.  Claims          
         22, 23, 38, 42, 59 and 63 have been indicated by the examiner as          
         being allowable and are not before us on appeal.  No other claims         
         are pending.                                                              


                                        -1-                                        





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007