Ex Parte BULUCEA et al - Page 3




         Appeal No. 2000-1483                                                      
         Application No. 08/851,608                                                


              a trench formed in said epitaxial layer, having                      
              substantially vertical side walls, extending from said top           
              surface of said epitaxial layer to a depth dtr, said depth           
              dtr being less than said depth dmax, and greater than said           
              depth d, said trench being (i) closer to said second                 
              location than said first location, and (ii) horizontally             
              adjacent said source region;                                         
              wherein breakdown in said trench DMOS transistor occurs              
              across said epitaxial layer at a position closer to said             
              first location than said second location.                            
              The examiner relies on the following references:                     
         Jambotkar                       4,165,700          Mar. 20, 1979          
         Tonnel                          4,420,379          Dec. 13, 1983          
         Daisuke Ueda et al. (Ueda), "A New Vertical Power MOSFET                  
         Structure with Extremely Reduced On-Resistance," ED-32 IEEE               
         Transactions on Electron Devices no. 1, 2-6 (January 1985)                
         Kikuo Yamabe et al. (Yamabe), "Nonplanar Oxidation and Reduction          
         of Oxide Leakage Currents at Silicon Corners by Rounding-off              
         Oxidation," ED-34 IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices no. 8,            
         1681-87 (August 1987)                                                     
              Claims 17-21, 25-37, 39-41, 44, 46-58, 60-62, 64 and 65              
         stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of                     
         obviousness, the examiner offers Tonnel and Ueda with regard to           
         claims 17-21, 25-29, 32-37, 44, 46-58, 64 and 65, adding                  
         Jambotkar with regard to claim 30 and further adding Yamabe with          
         regard to claims 31, 39-41 and 60-62.                                     
              Reference is made to the brief and answer for the respective         
         positions of appellants and the examiner.                                 


                                        -3-                                        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007