Ex Parte IKUTA et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2000-1515                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 08/687,195                                                  


          comprises a three-step translation.  First, a sentence to be                
          translated is divided into “word trains.”  Second, the original             
          sentence is converted into a translated sentence for each divided           
          word train; a symbol is inserted at partition positions of the              
          divided original and translated sentences to facilitate                     
          correspondence between the sentences.  Third, the original                  
          sentence and the translated sentence are displayed in a one-to-             
          one word train correspondence.  A further understanding of the              
          invention can be achieved by reading the following claim:                   
                    1. A mechanical translation method comprising:                    
                    (a) dividing an input laterally written original                  
               sentence into a plurality of word trains in accordance                 
               with a predetermined division rule;                                    
                    (b) converting the original sentence into a                       
               translated sentence for each divided word train, the                   
               translated sentence being divided into word trains; and                
                    (c) displaying the original sentence and the                      
               translated sentence so that the divided original                       
               sentence and the divided translated sentence are                       
               arranged at vertically juxtaposed positions, wherein                   
               the division rule is a rule of dividing the original                   
               sentence into one of phrases and clauses.                              


               The prior art applied by the examiner in rejecting the                 
          claims follows:                                                             
               Adachi et al. (“Adachi”)      4,866,670      Sep. 12, 1989             








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007