Appeal No. 2000-1515 Page 12
Application No. 08/687,195
“Then, those three [resultant] phrases are sent to the
translation unit 18,” id. at ll. 59-60, for translation.
As mentioned regarding the first point of contention, the
primary reference then displays the original sentence and a
translated sentence. Figure 5B of Adachi shows that the original
and translated sentences are displayed as divided. When
Fujisawa’s over-and-under layout was used to display Adachi’s
divided, translated sentence under its divided, original
sentence, the combination of teachings would have suggested
displaying the divided, original sentence and the divided,
translated sentence in vertically juxtaposed positions.
Therefore, we affirm the rejection of representative claim 1;
claims 4, 6-8, 15, and 16, which fall therewith; representative
claim 9; claims 10, 12-14, and 16-18, which fall therewith;
representative claim 21; and claims 22, 23, and 26-29, which fall
therewith.
CONCLUSION
In summary, the rejection of claims 1, 4, 6-10, 12-18, 21-23
and 26-29 under § 103(a) is affirmed. Our affirmance is based
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007