The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 26 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte VOLKER NITSCHE and DR. WERNER SCHAIRER ____________ Appeal No. 2000-2118 Application No. 08/995,1391 ____________ HEARD: NOVEMBER 21, 2002 ____________ Before LALL, GROSS, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-5, which are all of the claims pending in the present application. We reverse. BACKGROUND Appellants’ invention is directed to an optoelectronic component suitable for mounting on a circuit board. External connecting leads all emerge from one lateral face of the 1 Application for patent filed December 19, 1997, which claims the foreign filing priority benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of German Application 19653054.7, filed December 19, 1996.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007