The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 40 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte JACK D. KEENE, DANIEL J. KENAN, and DONALD E. TSAI __________ Appeal No. 2000-2269 Application No. 08/862,337 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, SCHEINER, and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges. GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 8-11, 13, 14, 21, 26-34, 49, 50, 58, 59, 68-72, 78, and 79, all of the claims remaining. Claims 1 and 26 are representative and read as follows: 1. A method of generating a nucleic acid species which is immunologically cross-reactive with an immunogen, which immunogen is not a nucleic acid, said method comprising:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007