Ex Parte KEENE et al - Page 4



                  Appeal No. 2000-2269                                                           Page 4                    
                  Application No. 08/862,337                                                                               

                  at the same antigen-recognition site bound by the immunogen.  Claim 26 is                                
                  directed to a nucleic acid that binds an antigen binding protein at the same                             
                  antigen recognition site as a non-nucleic acid immunogen; i.e., a nucleic acid                           
                  produced in a process such as that of claim 1.                                                           
                  1.  The rejection over Gold                                                                              
                         The examiner rejected the claims as obvious in view of the teachings of                           
                  either Gold ‘163 or Gold PCT.1  The examiner characterized Gold as teaching                              
                         a method for identifying nucleic acid species which interact with                                 
                         targets comprising the steps: a) combining a broad class of                                       
                         molecules including proteins, such as antigen binding proteins or                                 
                         antibodies, [and] receptors, such as T cell receptors . . . , with a                              
                         degenerate pool of nucleic acids . . . , b) recovering a nucleic acid                             
                         bound to the target at a specific site . . . , c) amplifying selected                             
                         nucleic acids by cDNA synthesis followed by PCR and RNA                                           
                         transcription. . . .  Gold also teaches the interaction of selected                               
                         nucleic acids with proteins not known to bind nucleic acids . . . as                              
                         well as the use of solid supports.                                                                
                  Examiner’s Answer, page 4.                                                                               
                         The examiner concluded that                                                                       
                         [i]t would have been prima facie obvious to one having ordinary skill                             
                         in the art at the time the invention was made to utilize the method of                            
                         Gold for the identification of targets of any molecule and any                                    
                         epitope.  The method of Gold is not limited to the specific examples                              
                         cited in the patent, and an ordinary practitioner would have been                                 
                         able to utilize the method of Gold to identify nucleic acids which                                
                         interact with any specific desired antibody, and for the selection of                             
                         nucleic acids which can compete for binding at an antibody target                                 
                         site.                                                                                             
                  Examiner’s Answer, page 5.                                                                               
                                                                                                                           
                  1 Although the rejection is putatively based on either Gold reference, the examiner cited only to        
                  Gold ‘163 when explaining the basis of the rejection.  The disclosures of both Gold references           
                  appear to be identical.  Therefore, we will limit our discussion to Gold ‘163.                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007