Ex parte SASAKI et al. - Page 1




           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was                      
           not written for publication and is not binding precedent of                         
           the Board.                                                                          
                                                                   Paper No. 29                

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                              
                                         __________                                            
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                 
                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                        
                                         __________                                            
                        Ex parte MASAO SASAKI and KIYOHIKO FUNATO                              
                                         __________                                            
                                    Appeal No. 2001-0118                                       
                                Application No. 09/013,927                                     
                                         __________                                            
                                     HEARD: May 8, 2002                                        
                                         __________                                            

           Before GARRIS, JEFFREY T. SMITH, and MOORE, Administrative                          
           Patent Judges.                                                                      
           GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                

                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                        
                This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection                       
           of claims 2 and 4 which are all of the claims remaining in the                      
           application.                                                                        
                The subject matter on appeal relates to an ionizing                            
           sputtering method comprising the steps of maintaining an                            
                                              1                                                





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007