Ex Parte ANDREW et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2001-0550                                                        
          Application No. 09/030,792                                                  

                    1.   A method for liquefying solid tissue within a body           
               comprising the steps of:                                               
                    heating a biocompatible fluid;                                    
                    presenting said fluid to target tissue within a                   
               surgical area so that said target tissue is liquefied when             
               contacted with said heated fluid while leaving non-target              
               tissue intact; and                                                     
                    aspirating said melted target tissue.                             
               13.       A liquefaction apparatus for liquefying solid                
               tissue within a body comprising:                                       
                    a source of heated solution;                                      
                    means for directing said heated solution to the tissue            
               in order to liquefy only the tissue;                                   
                    means for irrigating the tissue while the heated                  
               solution is being applied to the tissue; and                           
                    means for aspirating the liquefied portion of the                 
               tissue.                                                                
               The references applied in the final rejection are:                     
          Spina et al. (Spina)            4,191,176           Mar.  4, 1980           
          Matsunaga et al. (Matsunaga)    4,436,722           Mar. 13, 1984           
          Dieras et al. (Dieras)          4,804,364           Feb. 14, 1989           
          Masterson et al. (Masterson)    5,653,692           Aug.  5, 1997           
               Claims 13 and 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as            
          being anticipated by Dieras.                                                
               Claims 1, 8 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e)             
          as being anticipated by Masterson.                                          


                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007