Ex Parte YANG et al - Page 6



          Appeal No. 2001-0607                                                        
          Application No. 09/244,429                                                  

               The examiner apparently relies on Yoshimi for a suggestion             
          of the claimed thickness but it is not clear as to on what,                 
          exactly, in Yoshimi the examiner is relying.  After arguing that            
          every patent is presumed valid, in response to appellants’                  
          argument that Yoshimi is not enabling, the examiner states:                 
               Thicknesses within range as stated by Yoshimi...are                    
               used through out the specification for other layers                    
               and, therefore, it is reasonable to assume one of                      
               ordinary skill in the art can obtain such thicknesses for              
               the gate electrode [answer-page 7].                                    
               At page 8 of the answer, the examiner indicates that Yoshimi           
          discloses a range of thicknesses between 15 and 3000 Angstroms.             
          Although the examiner does not identify the portion of Yoshimi              
          relied upon, it is clear that the examiner is citing column 1,              
          lines 37-39, of the reference.  This portion of the reference,              
          describing the prior art to Yoshimi, calls for a second                     
          polysilicon layer to be 15-3000 Angstroms thick over the entire             
          surface of an interlayer insulator 14 which has been grown by               
          thermal oxidation over a floating gate pattern 13 on a gate oxide           
          12 which is on a substrate 8.  A “resist pattern 16 is formed on            
          the second polysilicon layer 15 to define a control gate 17, as             
          shown in Figure 21.”  While Figure 21 does not show the control             
          gate 17, it can be seen in Figure 23, where the control gate 17             

                                         -6–                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007