Ex Parte KIM - Page 2



           Appeal No. 2001-0836                                                                      
           Application No. 08/991,448                                                                

           layer.  Each stack further includes at least one sidewall layer,                          
           with the HSG layer overlapping and contacting the sidewall layer.                         
           According to Appellant (specification, pages 2-4), the inclusion                          
           of the relatively large grain size HSG layer improves gate                                
           coupling, while the relatively small grain size of the                                    
           polysilicon layer establishes a relatively flat surface interface                         
           with the tunnel oxide layer.                                                              
                 Claim 9 is illustrative of the invention and reads as                               
           follows:                                                                                  
                 9.   A flash memory wafer, comprising:                                              
                       a core memory region including at least one silicon                           
                 substrate; and                                                                      
                       plural stacks in the core memory region, each stack                           
                 having at least one respective polysilicon layer on a tunnel                        
                 oxide layer and at least one HSG layer above the polysilicon                        
                 [sic, layer] each stack also having at least one sidewall                           
                 layer, the HSG layer overlapping and contacting the sidewall                        
                 layer.1                                                                             
                 The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                                     
           Esquivel et al. (Esquivel)          4,855,800               Aug. 08, 1989                 
           Yew et al. (Yew)                    5,753,559               May  19, 1998                 
                                                           (filed Oct. 09, 1996)                     
           Lim                                 5,879,989               Mar. 09, 1999                 
                                                           (filed Jan. 03, 1997)                     

                 1Both Appellant and the Examiner should note that the word                          
           “layer” is missing after “polysilicon,” second occurrence, at                             
           line 4 of claim 9 as it appears in the amendment filed November                           
           18, 1999, Paper No. 9.                                                                    
                                                 2                                                   




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007