Appeal No. 2001-0836
Application No. 08/991,448
not established a prima facie case of obviousness. Accordingly,
the 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of independent claim 9 and its
dependent claims 11-14, as well as independent claim 23, is not
sustained.
In conclusion, we have not sustained the Examiner’s
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of any of the claims on appeal.
Therefore, the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 9,
11-14, and 23 is reversed.
REVERSED
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
LEE E. BARRETT ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JFR:hh
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007