The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 24 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte LOUIS B. PORZILLI ____________ Appeal No. 2001-0913 Application No. 09/002,058 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges. HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 34. In an Amendment After Final (paper number 17), claims 6, 281 and 33 were amended. The disclosed invention relates to an acoustic wave enhancing means coupled to the resonant chamber of a stringed instrument to selectively enhance only the acoustic waves of a lower portion of a range of frequencies. 1 Based upon the amendment, the indefiniteness rejection of claims 6 and 28 was withdrawn (paper numbers 19 and 20).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007