Ex Parte PORZILLI - Page 1




                              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written           
                                     for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                    

                                                                                            Paper No. 24           

                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                           
                                                    ____________                                                   
                                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                                    ____________                                                   
                                             Ex parte LOUIS B. PORZILLI                                            
                                                    ____________                                                   
                                                Appeal No. 2001-0913                                               
                                              Application No. 09/002,058                                           
                                                    ____________                                                   
                                                     ON BRIEF                                                      
                                                    ____________                                                   
             Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges.                                 
             HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                



                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                           This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 34.  In an Amendment     
             After Final (paper number 17), claims 6, 281 and 33 were amended.                                     
                    The disclosed invention relates to an acoustic wave enhancing means coupled to the resonant    
             chamber of a stringed instrument to selectively enhance only the acoustic waves of a lower portion    
             of a range of frequencies.                                                                            

                    1 Based upon the amendment, the indefiniteness rejection of claims 6 and 28 was                
             withdrawn (paper numbers 19 and 20).                                                                  





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007