Appeal No. 2001-0913
Application No. 09/002,058
Claims 27 and 34 stand rejected under the second paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 for
indefiniteness.
Claims 1, 8, 13 through 15, 19 through 22 and 31 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over de Cristofaro in view of Pedersen.
Claims 2, 4, 24, 25, 29 and 32 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable
over de Cristofaro in view of Pedersen and Kalaf.
Claims 3 and 5 through 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over
de Cristofaro in view of Pedersen, Kalaf and Doschek.
Claims 9 through 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over de
Cristofaro in view Pedersen and Redlinger.
Claim 12 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over de Cristofaro
in view of Pedersen, Redlinger and Kasha.
Claims 16 and 17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over de
Cristofaro in view of Pedersen and Desmond.
Claim 18 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over de Cristofaro
in view of Pedersen, Desmond and Newton.
Claims 23 and 28 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over de
Cristofaro in view of Pedersen and appellant’s admitted prior art.
Claim 26 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over de Cristofaro
in view of Pedersen, Kalaf and McGill.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007